Incorporating R410A in Modern HVAC Systems

Importance of Proper Refrigerant Levels

Mobile homes, often celebrated for their affordability and flexibility, present unique challenges and opportunities when it comes to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. These compact living spaces require HVAC solutions that are efficient, space-conscious, and capable of maintaining comfort despite varying external conditions. One significant advancement in this field is the incorporation of R410A refrigerant into modern HVAC systems.


R410A has emerged as a popular choice in HVAC due to its superior energy efficiency and environmental benefits compared to its predecessors like R22. As mobile home owners seek sustainable and cost-effective climate control solutions, understanding the nuances of integrating R410A into these environments becomes crucial.


One of the primary considerations for mobile home HVAC systems is their size. Space constraints necessitate compact yet effective units capable of providing adequate heating and cooling without overwhelming the limited interior space. Properly sealed ductwork prevents energy loss in mobile home HVAC systems mobile home hvac system flat roof. R410A-compatible systems tend to be more compact because they operate at higher pressures than older refrigerants, allowing manufacturers to design smaller components without sacrificing performance. This feature aligns well with the spatial limitations inherent in mobile homes.


Moreover, mobile homes are often subject to more extreme temperature fluctuations than traditional houses due to their construction materials and design. Therefore, an efficient HVAC system must not only fit within tight quarters but also respond quickly to changes in ambient temperature. Systems using R410A refrigerant benefit from improved heat absorption capabilities which translates into faster cooling times-a significant advantage during hot summer months when rapid temperature control is essential for comfort.


Energy efficiency is another vital consideration for mobile home residents who frequently encounter budgetary constraints. The enhanced thermodynamic properties of R410A allow systems using this refrigerant to operate more efficiently, reducing both energy consumption and utility costs over time. This efficiency ensures that even those on a tight budget can maintain comfortable indoor environments without incurring prohibitive expenses.


Environmental impact is a growing concern among homeowners across all types of residences. Traditional refrigerants such as R22 have been phased out due to their ozone-depleting characteristics; thus, adopting environmentally friendly alternatives like R410A becomes imperative. This transition not only complies with international environmental standards but also contributes positively towards global sustainability efforts-an appealing factor for eco-conscious consumers residing in mobile homes.


That said, incorporating R410A into mobile home HVAC systems does come with specific requirements that must be addressed by both manufacturers and installers alike. For instance, because it operates at higher pressure levels than previous refrigerants, components need robust engineering designs capable of handling these pressures safely over long periods.


Additionally, upgrading or replacing existing systems demands professional expertise since technicians must be familiar with the intricacies involved when working with high-pressure gases such as R410A safely-underscoring the importance of hiring qualified professionals during installation or maintenance phases.


In conclusion, while integrating modern HVAC technologies such as those utilizing R410A presents certain challenges within the context of mobile homes-it ultimately offers substantial benefits including improved energy efficiency lower operational costs reduced environmental impacts along enhanced user comfort levels making them highly attractive options worth considering today's rapidly evolving housing landscape .

Incorporating R410A into modern HVAC systems for mobile homes presents a range of benefits that make it an increasingly popular choice among homeowners and manufacturers. As we look for more efficient and environmentally friendly solutions in our everyday applications, R410A stands out as a compelling option.


One of the primary advantages of using R410A in HVAC systems is its impressive energy efficiency. Compared to older refrigerants like R22, R410A operates at a higher pressure, which enables better heat transfer capabilities. This means that HVAC systems utilizing R410A can cool or heat spaces more effectively while consuming less energy. For mobile home owners who are often mindful of energy consumption and costs, this efficiency translates into lower utility bills and reduced environmental impact.


Additionally, R410A is known for its superior performance in varying climatic conditions, making it ideal for mobile homes that may be exposed to diverse weather patterns throughout the year. Its ability to maintain consistent temperature control ensures comfort regardless of external temperatures. This reliability is crucial for maintaining a livable and pleasant environment within the compact spaces typical of mobile homes.


From an environmental perspective, R410A offers significant benefits over traditional refrigerants. It has zero ozone depletion potential (ODP), meaning it does not contribute to the degradation of the ozone layer-a critical consideration given global efforts to mitigate climate change and protect our planet's atmosphere. While no refrigerant is entirely without environmental impact, choosing those with lower ODP values aligns with broader sustainability goals.


The adoption of R410A in mobile home HVAC systems also aligns with regulatory trends aimed at phasing out older refrigerants that are harmful to the environment. As governments worldwide impose stricter regulations on substances like R22 due to their ozone-depleting characteristics, transitioning to alternatives such as R410A becomes not just advantageous but necessary for compliance.


Moreover, technological advancements have made systems designed around R410A more accessible and easier to service compared to their predecessors. The widespread use of this refrigerant has resulted in a robust market with ample availability of parts and expertise among technicians-an important factor when considering long-term maintenance and repair needs.


Overall, incorporating R410A into mobile home HVAC applications provides myriad benefits ranging from enhanced efficiency and comfort to regulatory compliance and environmental responsibility. As we continue navigating toward more sustainable living solutions, embracing technologies like those using R410A constitutes a step forward in creating comfortable yet ecologically mindful living environments.

Addressing Frequent HVAC Problems Faced by Mobile Home Owners

Owning a mobile home comes with its own set of unique challenges, particularly when it comes to maintaining essential systems like heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC).. Unlike traditional homes, mobile homes often have distinct structural and mechanical characteristics that can lead to frequent HVAC issues.

Posted by on 2024-12-27

Eco Friendly HVAC Solutions for Sustainable Mobile Living

As the world continues to grapple with the pressing challenges of climate change and environmental degradation, the demand for eco-friendly solutions across various sectors is becoming increasingly urgent.. One area that is rapidly evolving in response to this demand is sustainable HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems for mobile living.

Posted by on 2024-12-27

Signs and Symptoms of Low Refrigerant

Integrating R410A into existing HVAC systems presents a unique set of challenges and considerations that must be carefully navigated to ensure both efficiency and compliance with environmental standards. R410A, a hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant, has become increasingly popular due to its superior energy efficiency and lower ozone depletion potential compared to older refrigerants like R22. However, the transition requires thoughtful planning and execution.


One of the primary challenges in integrating R410A is compatibility. Existing systems designed for other refrigerants often cannot accommodate R410A without significant modifications or replacements of key components. This is because R410A operates at higher pressures than many traditional refrigerants; thus, components such as compressors, condensers, and evaporators may need to be upgraded or replaced entirely to handle these pressures safely. Failure to do so could lead to equipment failure or safety hazards.


In addition to mechanical considerations, there are also economic factors at play. Retrofitting an existing system can be costly, not only in terms of parts but also labor. Moreover, businesses must weigh these upfront costs against long-term savings from improved energy efficiency. While R410A's performance can lead to reduced energy consumption and lower utility bills over time, the initial investment can be a significant barrier for some stakeholders.


Another critical consideration is regulatory compliance. As environmental concerns mount globally, regulations surrounding refrigerants have become more stringent. Integrating R410A into HVAC systems aligns with many international environmental protocols aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions but necessitates adherence to specific guidelines regarding installation and maintenance practices.


Moreover, technical expertise is crucial when transitioning to R410A systems. Technicians need specialized training due to the differences in handling high-pressure refrigerants safely and effectively. This includes understanding the correct procedures for charging systems with R410A and recognizing the implications of using polyolester oils (POE), which are typically required with this refrigerant type due to their compatibility characteristics.


Finally, consideration must be given to future-proofing investments in HVAC technology. As the industry continues evolving toward even more environmentally friendly solutions like low-global-warming-potential (GWP) alternatives, stakeholders should remain informed about potential shifts in market trends that could influence future decisions regarding system upgrades or replacements.


In conclusion, while incorporating R410A into modern HVAC systems offers several advantages related to performance and environmental impact reduction, it involves navigating complex challenges related primarily around technical compatibility issues along with financial constraints associated with retrofitting efforts plus ensuring compliance under evolving regulatory frameworks-all requiring strategic planning supported by knowledgeable technical expertise within this rapidly advancing field.

Signs and Symptoms of Low Refrigerant

Impact of Low Refrigerant on HVAC System Performance

Energy efficiency has become a pivotal focus in the modern world, particularly within the realm of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. As technology continues to evolve, so too does our ability to enhance energy efficiency in various living environments, including mobile homes. One significant advancement in this field is the incorporation of R410A refrigerant into HVAC systems designed for mobile home settings.


Mobile homes present unique challenges and opportunities when it comes to energy efficiency. These structures are typically smaller and may have less insulation compared to traditional houses, which can lead to higher energy consumption if not properly managed. Integrating R410A into the HVAC systems of mobile homes offers a promising solution to these challenges.


R410A is a hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant that has gained popularity due to its superior thermodynamic properties compared to older refrigerants like R22. One of the most notable advantages of R410A is its ability to absorb and release heat more efficiently, which enhances the overall performance of an HVAC system. This leads directly to improved energy efficiency because the system doesn't have to work as hard or as long to maintain comfortable temperatures within a mobile home.


Furthermore, R410A operates at higher pressures than many other refrigerants, which allows for smaller components within the HVAC system itself. This size reduction can be particularly beneficial in mobile home environments where space is at a premium. The compact nature of systems using R410A also contributes to easier installation and maintenance, further reducing potential costs associated with energy inefficiency.


In addition to its mechanical benefits, R410A is considered more environmentally friendly than its predecessors. As awareness around climate change grows, utilizing a refrigerant with lower ozone depletion potential aligns with global efforts towards sustainability. While it still has some global warming potential, it represents a step forward from previous options and encourages continued innovation in refrigerant technology.


The integration of R410A into mobile home HVAC systems demonstrates how targeted technological advancements can result in significant improvements in energy efficiency. For residents of mobile homes, this means not only reduced utility bills but also enhanced comfort levels throughout varying seasons. Additionally, by adopting more efficient systems that use environmentally considerate refrigerants like R410A, homeowners contribute positively towards broader ecological goals.


Ultimately, incorporating R410A into modern HVAC systems for mobile homes exemplifies how thoughtful engineering solutions can address specific environmental constraints while promoting sustainable living practices. It underscores the importance of ongoing innovation as we seek ways to balance human needs with those of our planet-a journey that holds promise for future generations seeking harmony between technology and nature's resources.

Steps for Diagnosing Low Refrigerant Issues

The environmental impact of refrigerants has become a significant concern in the modern world, as industries strive to balance technological advancement with ecological responsibility. R410A, a hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) that has been widely used in modern HVAC systems, offers both advantages and challenges when compared to other refrigerants.


R410A was introduced as a more environmentally friendly alternative to older chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), such as R22, which were notorious for their ozone-depleting properties. Unlike its predecessors, R410A has zero ozone depletion potential (ODP), making it a safer choice for the stratospheric ozone layer. This characteristic significantly contributed to its widespread adoption in residential and commercial air conditioning systems.


However, while R410A is less harmful to the ozone layer, it does have a high global warming potential (GWP). With a GWP of around 2,088 times that of carbon dioxide over a 100-year period, R410A contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions if released into the atmosphere. This high GWP presents an environmental challenge as countries aim to reduce their carbon footprints and adhere to international agreements like the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.


In comparison with other emerging refrigerants such as R32 or natural refrigerants like CO2 and ammonia, R410A is caught in a transitional phase. R32, for instance, boasts a lower GWP of approximately 675 and improves energy efficiency due to its superior thermodynamic properties. Natural refrigerants like CO2 are even more promising from an environmental perspective due to their negligible GWPs; however, they often require more complex system designs and higher operating pressures.


Despite these challenges, incorporating R410A into modern HVAC systems remains prevalent due to its favorable safety profile-being non-flammable-and compatibility with existing technologies. The industry faces the task of optimizing these systems for better energy efficiency while minimizing leakage rates during operation and maintenance activities.


In conclusion, while R410A represents progress from older refrigerant types by eliminating ozone depletion risks, its high GWP necessitates further innovation and adaptation within HVAC technology. Transitioning towards lower-GWP alternatives is becoming increasingly critical as part of global efforts to mitigate climate change impacts. As research continues into new refrigeration technologies and improved system designs, HVAC professionals must remain vigilant in balancing performance demands with environmental stewardship-a challenge that defines our current era of sustainable development.

Preventive Measures and Maintenance Tips

Incorporating R410A in modern HVAC systems, particularly within the context of mobile homes, presents both an exciting opportunity and a unique set of challenges. As environmental regulations tighten, the transition from older refrigerants like R22 to more eco-friendly alternatives such as R410A becomes imperative. This shift is not merely about compliance but also about enhancing energy efficiency and operational effectiveness. Therefore, understanding the installation and maintenance guidelines for R410A-based systems in mobile homes is crucial for homeowners and technicians alike.


Mobile homes require careful consideration when it comes to HVAC system installations due to their size constraints and differing structural dynamics compared to traditional homes. The compact nature of these residences necessitates efficient use of space without compromising on comfort. When installing an R410A-based system, it is essential to choose appropriately sized equipment that can operate effectively within limited spaces while meeting the cooling or heating demands of the home.


One primary consideration during installation is ensuring that all components are compatible with R410A refrigerant. Unlike its predecessor R22, which has been phased out due to its ozone-depleting properties, R410A operates at higher pressures. This necessitates using specific piping materials and fittings designed to withstand these pressures safely. Additionally, proper insulation of ductwork is vital to prevent energy loss and ensure the system operates at peak efficiency.


The installation process must also account for proper ventilation. Mobile homes often have less natural airflow than traditional structures, making mechanical ventilation systems integral in maintaining indoor air quality. Ensuring adequate airflow not only enhances comfort but also prevents moisture build-up that could lead to mold growth or damage the HVAC system itself.


Once installed, regular maintenance of an R410A-based system becomes critical in preserving its longevity and performance efficiency. Routine checks should include inspecting refrigerant levels, cleaning coils and filters, and ensuring there are no leaks within the system. Given that R410A operates under higher pressure conditions, any leakage could lead to significant inefficiencies or even potential harm if not promptly addressed.


Technicians working with these systems need specialized training due to the distinct characteristics of R410A refrigerant. Understanding its thermodynamic properties allows for more accurate troubleshooting and ensures repairs are conducted safely without inadvertently releasing refrigerants into the atmosphere. Homeowners should be encouraged to schedule regular professional inspections as part of their maintenance routine.


Furthermore, educating homeowners about basic upkeep tasks like regularly changing air filters can significantly impact system performance and energy consumption levels over time. Clean filters improve airflow efficiency and maintain indoor air quality by trapping dust particles before they circulate throughout living spaces.


In conclusion, incorporating R410A into modern HVAC systems within mobile homes represents a forward-thinking approach towards sustainable living. However, this transition requires meticulous attention during both installation and ongoing maintenance phases due to higher operating pressures associated with this environmentally friendly refrigerant type coupled with spatial limitations inherent in mobile home design layouts.


By adhering closely to industry guidelines while fostering awareness among homeowners regarding necessary care practices post-installation - we pave way for achieving optimal results: improved energy efficiency without sacrificing comfort levels inside our compact yet cozy abodes!

When to Call a Professional HVAC Technician

The landscape of mobile home HVAC systems is undergoing a significant transformation as the industry embraces future trends and innovations in refrigerants. Central to this evolution is the incorporation of R410A, a refrigerant that has become a cornerstone in modern HVAC systems. As environmental awareness grows and regulatory standards become more stringent, the shift toward sustainable and efficient refrigerants like R410A is both timely and essential.


R410A, often hailed for its superior efficiency over traditional refrigerants like R22, plays a pivotal role in enhancing the performance of mobile home HVAC systems. Its ability to absorb and release heat more effectively allows for better energy efficiency, which translates into lower operational costs for homeowners. This is particularly beneficial in mobile homes where space constraints demand compact yet powerful cooling solutions. By providing an efficient means of temperature regulation, R410A-equipped systems meet these demands while reducing overall energy consumption-a crucial factor as we strive to minimize our carbon footprint.


Moreover, the adoption of R410A aligns with global environmental initiatives aimed at phasing out ozone-depleting substances. Unlike its predecessors, R410A does not contribute to ozone layer depletion due to its chlorine-free composition. This makes it an environmentally friendly option that complies with international protocols such as the Montreal Protocol and national regulations focused on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As industries worldwide pivot towards sustainable practices, integrating R410A into mobile home HVAC systems represents a proactive step towards greener living.


Innovation within this realm isn't limited to refrigerant choice alone; advancements in system design are also pivotal. Modern HVAC units utilizing R410A are often engineered with improved technologies that enhance their overall functionality. Features such as variable speed compressors and smart thermostats allow for precise control over temperature settings, optimizing comfort while further improving energy efficiency. These technological enhancements make it feasible for mobile homeowners to enjoy state-of-the-art climate control without compromising on eco-friendliness or affordability.


Looking ahead, the role of R410A in mobile home HVAC systems will likely continue evolving alongside further technological innovations and shifts towards even more sustainable alternatives like hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs). While current systems capitalize on the benefits offered by R410A, ongoing research aims to develop new blends that could offer even lower global warming potential without sacrificing performance.


In conclusion, the integration of R410A into modern HVAC systems marks a significant stride towards achieving balance between comfort, efficiency, and environmental responsibility within mobile homes. As we navigate future trends in refrigerant technology, one thing remains certain: embracing such innovations is essential not only for reducing ecological impact but also for pioneering new standards in residential heating and cooling solutions.

 

An air filter being cleaned

Indoor air quality (IAQ) is the air quality within buildings and structures. Poor indoor air quality due to indoor air pollution is known to affect the health, comfort, and well-being of building occupants. It has also been linked to sick building syndrome, respiratory issues, reduced productivity, and impaired learning in schools. Common pollutants of indoor air include: secondhand tobacco smoke, air pollutants from indoor combustion, radon, molds and other allergens, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, legionella and other bacteria, asbestos fibers, carbon dioxide,[1] ozone and particulates.

Source control, filtration, and the use of ventilation to dilute contaminants are the primary methods for improving indoor air quality. Although ventilation is an integral component of maintaining good indoor air quality, it may not be satisfactory alone.[2] In scenarios where outdoor pollution would deteriorate indoor air quality, other treatment devices such as filtration may also be necessary.[3]

IAQ is evaluated through collection of air samples, monitoring human exposure to pollutants, analysis of building surfaces, and computer modeling of air flow inside buildings. IAQ is part of indoor environmental quality (IEQ), along with other factors that exert an influence on physical and psychological aspects of life indoors (e.g., lighting, visual quality, acoustics, and thermal comfort).[4]

Indoor air pollution is a major health hazard in developing countries and is commonly referred to as "household air pollution" in that context.[5] It is mostly relating to cooking and heating methods by burning biomass fuel, in the form of wood, charcoal, dung, and crop residue, in indoor environments that lack proper ventilation. Millions of people, primarily women and children, face serious health risks. In total, about three billion people in developing countries are affected by this problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that cooking-related indoor air pollution causes 3.8 million annual deaths.[6] The Global Burden of Disease study estimated the number of deaths in 2017 at 1.6 million.[7]

Definition

[edit]

For health reasons it is crucial to breathe clean air, free from chemicals and toxicants as much as possible. It is estimated that humans spend approximately 90% of their lifetime indoors[8] and that indoor air pollution in some places can be much worse than that of the ambient air.[9][10]

Various factors contribute to high concentrations of pollutants indoors, ranging from influx of pollutants from external sources, off-gassing by furniture, furnishings including carpets, indoor activities (cooking, cleaning, painting, smoking, etc. in homes to using office equipment in offices), thermal comfort parameters such as temperature, humidity, airflow and physio-chemical properties of the indoor air.[citation needed] Air pollutants can enter a building in many ways, including through open doors or windows. Poorly maintained air conditioners/ventilation systems can harbor mold, bacteria, and other contaminants, which are then circulated throughout indoor spaces, contributing to respiratory problems and allergies.

There have been many debates among indoor air quality specialists about the proper definition of indoor air quality and specifically what constitutes "acceptable" indoor air quality.

Health effects

[edit]
Share of deaths from indoor air pollution. Darker colors mean higher numbers.

IAQ is significant for human health as humans spend a large proportion of their time in indoor environments. Americans and Europeans on average spend approximately 90% of their time indoors.[11][12]

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 3.2 million people die prematurely every year from illnesses attributed to indoor air pollution caused by indoor cooking, with over 237 thousand of these being children under 5. These include around an eighth of all global ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and lung cancer deaths. Overall the WHO estimated that poor indoor air quality resulted in the loss of 86 million healthy life years in 2019.[13]

Studies in the UK and Europe show exposure to indoor air pollutants, chemicals and biological contamination can irritate the upper airway system, trigger or exacerbate asthma and other respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, and may even have carcinogenic effects.[14][15][16][17][18][19]

Poor indoor air quality can cause sick building syndrome. Symptoms include burning of the eyes, scratchy throat, blocked nose, and headaches.[20]

Common pollutants

[edit]

Generated by indoor combustion

[edit]
a 3-stone stove
A traditional wood-fired 3-stone stove in Guatemala, which causes indoor air pollution

Indoor combustion, such as for cooking or heating, is a major cause of indoor air pollution and causes significant health harms and premature deaths. Hydrocarbon fires cause air pollution. Pollution is caused by both biomass and fossil fuels of various types, but some forms of fuels are more harmful than others.

Indoor fire can produce black carbon particles, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and mercury compounds, among other emissions.[21] Around 3 billion people cook over open fires or on rudimentary cook stoves. Cooking fuels are coal, wood, animal dung, and crop residues.[22] IAQ is a particular concern in low and middle-income countries where such practices are common.[23]

Cooking using natural gas (also called fossil gas, methane gas or simply gas) is associated with poorer indoor air quality. Combustion of gas produces nitrogen dioxide and carbon monixide, and can lead to increased concentrations of nitrogen dioxide throughout the home environment which is linked to respiratory issues and diseases.[24][25]

Carbon monoxide

[edit]

One of the most acutely toxic indoor air contaminants is carbon monoxide (CO), a colourless and odourless gas that is a by-product of incomplete combustion. Carbon monoxide may be emitted from tobacco smoke and generated from malfunctioning fuel burning stoves (wood, kerosene, natural gas, propane) and fuel burning heating systems (wood, oil, natural gas) and from blocked flues connected to these appliances.[26] In developed countries the main sources of indoor CO emission come from cooking and heating devices that burn fossil fuels and are faulty, incorrectly installed or poorly maintained.[27] Appliance malfunction may be due to faulty installation or lack of maintenance and proper use.[26] In low- and middle-income countries the most common sources of CO in homes are burning biomass fuels and cigarette smoke.[27]

Health effects of CO poisoning may be acute or chronic and can occur unintentionally or intentionally (self-harm). By depriving the brain of oxygen, acute exposure to carbon monoxide may have effects on the neurological system (headache, nausea, dizziness, alteration in consciousness and subjective weakness), the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (myocardial infarction, shortness of breath, or rapid breathing, respiratory failure). Acute exposure can also lead to long-term neurological effects such as cognitive and behavioural changes. Severe CO poisoning may lead to unconsciousness, coma and death. Chronic exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide may lead to lethargy, headaches, nausea, flu-like symptoms and neuropsychological and cardiovascular issues.[28][26]

The WHO recommended levels of indoor CO exposure in 24 hours is 4 mg/m3.[29] Acute exposure should not exceed 10 mg/m3 in 8 hours, 35 mg/m3 in one hour and 100 mg/m3 in 15 minutes.[27]

Secondhand tobacco smoke

[edit]

Secondhand smoke is tobacco smoke which affects people other than the 'active' smoker. It is made up of the exhaled smoke (15%) and mostly of smoke coming from the burning end of the cigarette, known as sidestream smoke (85%).[30]

Secondhand smoke contains more than 7000 chemicals, of which hundreds are harmful to health.[30] Secondhand tobacco smoke includes both a gaseous and a particulate materials which, with particular hazards arising from levels of carbon monoxide and very small particulates (fine particulate matter, especially PM2.5 and PM10) which get into the bronchioles and alveoles in the lung.[31] Inhaling secondhand smoke on multiple occasions can cause asthma, pneumonia, lung cancer, and sudden infant death syndrome, among other conditions.[32]

Thirdhand smoke (THS) refers to chemicals that settle on objects and bodies indoors after smoking. Exposure to thirdhand smoke can happen even after the actual cigarette smoke is not present anymore and affect those entering the indoor environment much later. Toxic substances of THS can react with other chemicals in the air and produce new toxic chemicals that are otherwise not present in cigarettes.[33]

The only certain method to improve indoor air quality as regards secondhand smoke is to eliminate smoking indoors.[34] Indoor e-cigarette use also increases home particulate matter concentrations.[35]

Particulates

[edit]

Atmospheric particulate matter, also known as particulates, can be found indoors and can affect the health of occupants. Indoor particulate matter can come from different indoor sources or be created as secondary aerosols through indoor gas-to-particle reactions. They can also be outdoor particles that enter indoors. These indoor particles vary widely in size, ranging from nanomet (nanoparticles/ultrafine particles emitted from combustion sources) to micromet (resuspensed dust).[36] Particulate matter can also be produced through cooking activities. Frying produces higher concentrations than boiling or grilling and cooking meat produces higher concentrations than cooking vegetables.[37] Preparing a Thanksgiving dinner can produce very high concentrations of particulate matter, exceeding 300 μg/m3.[38]

Particulates can penetrate deep into the lungs and brain from blood streams, causing health problems such as heart disease, lung disease, cancer and preterm birth.[39]

Generated from building materials, furnishing and consumer products

[edit]

Volatile organic compounds

[edit]

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) include a variety of chemicals, some of which may have short- and long-term adverse health effects. There are numerous sources of VOCs indoors, which means that their concentrations are consistently higher indoors (up to ten times higher) than outdoors.[40] Some VOCs are emitted directly indoors, and some are formed through the subsequent chemical reactions that can occur in the gas-phase, or on surfaces.[41][42] VOCs presenting health hazards include benzene, formaldehyde, tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene.[43]

VOCs are emitted by thousands of indoor products. Examples include: paints, varnishes, waxes and lacquers, paint strippers, cleaning and personal care products, pesticides, building materials and furnishings, office equipment such as copiers and printers, correction fluids and carbonless copy paper, graphics and craft materials including glues and adhesives, permanent markers, and photographic solutions.[44] Chlorinated drinking water releases chloroform when hot water is used in the home. Benzene is emitted from fuel stored in attached garages.

Human activities such as cooking and cleaning can also emit VOCs.[45][46] Cooking can release long-chain aldehydes and alkanes when oil is heated and terpenes can be released when spices are prepared and/or cooked.[45] Leaks of natural gas from cooking appliances have been linked to elevated levels of VOCs including benzene in homes in the USA.[47] Cleaning products contain a range of VOCs, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, alcohols and esters. Once released into the air, VOCs can undergo reactions with ozone and hydroxyl radicals to produce other VOCs, such as formaldehyde.[46]

Health effects include eye, nose, and throat irritation; headaches, loss of coordination, nausea; and damage to the liver, kidney, and central nervous system.[48]

Testing emissions from building materials used indoors has become increasingly common for floor coverings, paints, and many other important indoor building materials and finishes.[49] Indoor materials such as gypsum boards or carpet act as VOC 'sinks', by trapping VOC vapors for extended periods of time, and releasing them by outgassing. The VOCs can also undergo transformation at the surface through interaction with ozone.[42] In both cases, these delayed emissions can result in chronic and low-level exposures to VOCs.[50]

Several initiatives aim to reduce indoor air contamination by limiting VOC emissions from products. There are regulations in France and in Germany, and numerous voluntary ecolabels and rating systems containing low VOC emissions criteria such as EMICODE,[51] M1,[52] Blue Angel[53] and Indoor Air Comfort[54] in Europe, as well as California Standard CDPH Section 01350[55] and several others in the US. Due to these initiatives an increasing number of low-emitting products became available to purchase.

At least 18 microbial VOCs (MVOCs) have been characterised[56][57] including 1-octen-3-ol (mushroom alcohol), 3-Methylfuran, 2-pentanol, 2-hexanone, 2-heptanone, 3-octanone, 3-octanol, 2-octen-1-ol, 1-octene, 2-pentanone, 2-nonanone, borneol, geosmin, 1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-2-butanol, and thujopsene. The last four are products of Stachybotrys chartarum, which has been linked with sick building syndrome.[56]

Asbestos fibers

[edit]

Many common building materials used before 1975 contain asbestos, such as some floor tiles, ceiling tiles, shingles, fireproofing, heating systems, pipe wrap, taping muds, mastics, and other insulation materials. Normally, significant releases of asbestos fiber do not occur unless the building materials are disturbed, such as by cutting, sanding, drilling, or building remodelling. Removal of asbestos-containing materials is not always optimal because the fibers can be spread into the air during the removal process. A management program for intact asbestos-containing materials is often recommended instead.

When asbestos-containing material is damaged or disintegrates, microscopic fibers are dispersed into the air. Inhalation of asbestos fibers over long exposure times is associated with increased incidence of lung cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestosis. The risk of lung cancer from inhaling asbestos fibers is significantly greater for smokers. The symptoms of disease do not usually appear until about 20 to 30 years after the first exposure to asbestos.

Although all asbestos is hazardous, products that are friable, e.g. sprayed coatings and insulation, pose a significantly higher hazard as they are more likely to release fibers to the air.[58]

Microplastics

[edit]

Microplastic is a type of airborne particulates and is found to prevail in air.[59][60][61][62] A 2017 study found indoor airborne microfiber concentrations between 1.0 and 60.0 microfibers per cubic meter (33% of which were found to be microplastics).[63] Airborne microplastic dust can be produced during renovation, building, bridge and road reconstruction projects[64] and the use of power tools.[65]

Ozone

[edit]

Indoors ozone (O3) is produced by certain high-voltage electric devices (such as air ionizers), and as a by-product of other types of pollution. It appears in lower concentrations indoors than outdoors, usually at 0.2-0.7 of the outdoor concentration.[66] Typically, most ozone is lost to surface reactions indoors, rather than to reactions in air, due to the large surface to volume ratios found indoors.[67]

Outdoor air used for ventilation may have sufficient ozone to react with common indoor pollutants as well as skin oils and other common indoor air chemicals or surfaces. Particular concern is warranted when using "green" cleaning products based on citrus or terpene extracts, because these chemicals react very quickly with ozone to form toxic and irritating chemicals[46] as well as fine and ultrafine particles.[68] Ventilation with outdoor air containing elevated ozone concentrations may complicate remediation attempts.[69]

The WHO standard for ozone concentration is 60 μg/m3 for long-term exposure and 100 μg/m3 as the maximum average over an 8-hour period.[29] The EPA standard for ozone concentration is 0.07 ppm average over an 8-hour period.[70]

Biological agents

[edit]

Mold and other allergens

[edit]

Occupants in buildings can be exposed to fungal spores, cell fragments, or mycotoxins which can arise from a host of means, but there are two common classes: (a) excess moisture induced growth of mold colonies and (b) natural substances released into the air such as animal dander and plant pollen.[71]

While mold growth is associated with high moisture levels,[72] it is likely to grow when a combination of favorable conditions arises. As well as high moisture levels, these conditions include suitable temperatures, pH and nutrient sources.[73] Mold grows primarily on surfaces, and it reproduces by releasing spores, which can travel and settle in different locations. When these spores experience appropriate conditions, they can germinate and lead to mycelium growth.[74] Different mold species favor different environmental conditions to germinate and grow, some being more hydrophilic (growing at higher levels of relative humidity) and other more xerophilic (growing at levels of relative humidity as low as 75–80%).[74][75]

Mold growth can be inhibited by keeping surfaces at conditions that are further from condensation, with relative humidity levels below 75%. This usually translates to a relative humidity of indoor air below 60%, in agreement with the guidelines for thermal comfort that recommend a relative humidity between 40 and 60 %. Moisture buildup in buildings may arise from water penetrating areas of the building envelope or fabric, from plumbing leaks, rainwater or groundwater penetration, or from condensation due to improper ventilation, insufficient heating or poor thermal quality of the building envelope.[76] Even something as simple as drying clothes indoors on radiators can increase the risk of mold growth, if the humidity produced is not able to escape the building via ventilation.[77]

Mold predominantly affects the airways and lungs. Known effects of mold on health include asthma development and exacerbation,[78] with children and elderly at greater risk of more severe health impacts.[79] Infants in homes with mold have a much greater risk of developing asthma and allergic rhinitis.[80][71] More than half of adult workers in moldy or humid buildings suffer from nasal or sinus symptoms due to mold exposure.[71] Some varieties of mold contain toxic compounds (mycotoxins). However, exposure to hazardous levels of mycotoxin via inhalation is not possible in most cases, as toxins are produced by the fungal body and are not at significant levels in the released spores.

Legionella

[edit]

Legionnaires' disease is caused by a waterborne bacterium Legionella that grows best in slow-moving or still, warm water. The primary route of exposure is through the creation of an aerosol effect, most commonly from evaporative cooling towers or showerheads. A common source of Legionella in commercial buildings is from poorly placed or maintained evaporative cooling towers, which often release water in an aerosol which may enter nearby ventilation intakes. Outbreaks in medical facilities and nursing homes, where patients are immuno-suppressed and immuno-weak, are the most commonly reported cases of Legionellosis. More than one case has involved outdoor fountains at public attractions. The presence of Legionella in commercial building water supplies is highly under-reported, as healthy people require heavy exposure to acquire infection.

Legionella testing typically involves collecting water samples and surface swabs from evaporative cooling basins, shower heads, faucets/taps, and other locations where warm water collects. The samples are then cultured and colony forming units (cfu) of Legionella are quantified as cfu/liter.

Legionella is a parasite of protozoans such as amoeba, and thus requires conditions suitable for both organisms. The bacterium forms a biofilm which is resistant to chemical and antimicrobial treatments, including chlorine. Remediation for Legionella outbreaks in commercial buildings vary, but often include very hot water flushes (160 °F (71 °C)), sterilisation of standing water in evaporative cooling basins, replacement of shower heads, and, in some cases, flushes of heavy metal salts. Preventive measures include adjusting normal hot water levels to allow for 120 °F (49 °C) at the tap, evaluating facility design layout, removing faucet aerators, and periodic testing in suspect areas.

Other bacteria

[edit]
Airborne bacteria

There are many bacteria of health significance found in indoor air and on indoor surfaces. The role of microbes in the indoor environment is increasingly studied using modern gene-based analysis of environmental samples. Currently, efforts are under way to link microbial ecologists and indoor air scientists to forge new methods for analysis and to better interpret the results.[81]

A large fraction of the bacteria found in indoor air and dust are shed from humans. Among the most important bacteria known to occur in indoor air are Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae.[citation needed]

Virus

[edit]
Ninth floor layout of the Metropole Hotel in Hong Kong, showing where an outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) occurred

Viruses can also be a concern for indoor air quality. During the 2002–2004 SARS outbreak, virus-laden aerosols were found to have seeped into bathrooms from the bathroom floor drains, exacerbated by the draw of bathroom exhaust fans, resulting in the rapid spread of SARS in Amoy Gardens in Hong Kong.[82][83] Elsewhere in Hong Kong, SARS CoV RNA was found on the carpet and in the air intake vents of the Metropole Hotel, which showed that secondary environmental contamination could generate infectious aerosols and resulted in superspreading events.[84]

Carbon dioxide

[edit]

Humans are the main indoor source of carbon dioxide (CO2) in most buildings. Indoor CO2 levels are an indicator of the adequacy of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor occupant density and metabolic activity.

Indoor CO2 levels above 500 ppm can lead to higher blood pressure and heart rate, and increased peripheral blood circulation.[85] With CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm cognitive performance might be affected, especially when doing complex tasks, making decision making and problem solving slower but not less accurate.[86][87] However, evidence on the health effects of CO2 at lower concentrations is conflicting and it is difficult to link CO2 to health impacts at exposures below 5000 ppm – reported health outcomes may be due to the presence of human bioeffluents, and other indoor air pollutants related to inadequate ventilation.[88]

Indoor carbon dioxide concentrations can be used to evaluate the quality of a room or a building's ventilation.[89] To eliminate most complaints caused by CO2, the total indoor CO2 level should be reduced to a difference of no greater than 700 ppm above outdoor levels.[90] The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) considers that indoor air concentrations of carbon dioxide that exceed 1000 ppm are a marker suggesting inadequate ventilation.[91] The UK standards for schools say that carbon dioxide levels of 800 ppm or lower indicate that the room is well-ventilated.[92] Regulations and standards from around the world show that CO2 levels below 1000 ppm represent good IAQ, between 1000 and 1500 ppm represent moderate IAQ and greater than 1500 ppm represent poor IAQ.[88]

Carbon dioxide concentrations in closed or confined rooms can increase to 1,000 ppm within 45 minutes of enclosure. For example, in a 3.5-by-4-metre (11 ft × 13 ft) sized office, atmospheric carbon dioxide increased from 500 ppm to over 1,000 ppm within 45 minutes of ventilation cessation and closure of windows and doors.[93]

Radon

[edit]

Radon is an invisible, radioactive atomic gas that results from the radioactive decay of radium, which may be found in rock formations beneath buildings or in certain building materials themselves.

Radon is probably the most pervasive serious hazard for indoor air in the United States and Europe. It is a major cause of lung cancer, responsible for 3–14% of cases in countries, leading to tens of thousands of deaths.[94]

Radon gas enters buildings as a soil gas. As it is a heavy gas it will tend to accumulate at the lowest level. Radon may also be introduced into a building through drinking water particularly from bathroom showers. Building materials can be a rare source of radon, but little testing is carried out for stone, rock or tile products brought into building sites; radon accumulation is greatest for well insulated homes.[95] There are simple do-it-yourself kits for radon gas testing, but a licensed professional can also check homes.

The half-life for radon is 3.8 days, indicating that once the source is removed, the hazard will be greatly reduced within a few weeks. Radon mitigation methods include sealing concrete slab floors, basement foundations, water drainage systems, or by increasing ventilation.[96] They are usually cost effective and can greatly reduce or even eliminate the contamination and the associated health risks.[citation needed]

Radon is measured in picocuries per liter of air (pCi/L) or becquerel per cubic meter (Bq m-3). Both are measurements of radioactivity. The World Health Organization (WHO) sets the ideal indoor radon levels at 100 Bq/m-3.[97] In the United States, it is recommend to fix homes with radon levels at or above 4 pCi/L. At the same time it is also recommends that people think about fixing their homes for radon levels between 2 pCi/L and 4 pCi/L.[98] In the United Kingdom the ideal is presence of radon indoors is 100 Bq/m-3. Action needs to be taken in homes with 200 Bq/m−3 or more.[99]

Interactive maps of radon affected areas are available for various regions and countries of the world.[100][101][102]

IAQ and climate change

[edit]

Indoor air quality is linked inextricably to outdoor air quality. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has varying scenarios that predict how the climate will change in the future.[103] Climate change can affect indoor air quality by increasing the level of outdoor air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter, for example through emissions from wildfires caused by extreme heat and drought.[104][105] Numerous predictions for how indoor air pollutants will change have been made,[106][107][108][109] and models have attempted to predict how the forecasted IPCC scenarios will vary indoor air quality and indoor comfort parameters such as humidity and temperature.[110]

The net-zero challenge requires significant changes in the performance of both new and retrofitted buildings. However, increased energy efficient housing will trap pollutants inside, whether produced indoors or outdoors, and lead to an increase in human exposure.[111][112]

Indoor air quality standards and monitoring

[edit]

Quality guidelines and standards

[edit]

For occupational exposure, there are standards, which cover a wide range of chemicals, and applied to healthy adults who are exposed over time at workplaces (usually industrial environments).These are published by organisations such as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

There is no consensus globally about indoor air quality standards, or health-based guidelines. However, there are regulations from some individual countries and from health organisations. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published health-based global air quality guidelines for the general population that are applicable both to outdoor and indoor air,[29] as well as the WHO IAQ guidelines for selected compounds,[113] whereas the UK Health Security Agency published IAQ guidelines for selected VOCs.[114] The Scientific and Technical Committee (STC34) of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) created an open database that collects indoor environmental quality guidelines worldwide.[115] The database is focused on indoor air quality (IAQ), but is currently extended to include standards, regulations, and guidelines related to ventilation, comfort, acoustics, and lighting.[116][117]

Real-time monitoring

[edit]

Since indoor air pollutants can adversely affect human health, it is important to have real-time indoor air quality assessment/monitoring system that can help not only in the improvement of indoor air quality but also help in detection of leaks, spills in a work environment and boost energy efficiency of buildings by providing real-time feedback to the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system(s).[118] Additionally, there have been enough studies that highlight the correlation between poor indoor air quality and loss of performance and productivity of workers in an office setting.[119]  

Combining the Internet of Things (IoT) technology with real-time IAQ monitoring systems has  tremendously gained momentum and popularity as interventions can be done based on the real-time sensor data and thus help in the IAQ improvement.[120]   

Improvement measures

[edit]

Indoor air quality can be addressed, achieved or maintained during the design of new buildings or as mitigating measures in existing buildings. A hierarchy of measures has been proposed by the Institute of Air Quality Management. It emphasises removing pollutant sources, reducing emissions from any remaining sources, disrupting pathways between sources and the people exposed, protecting people from exposure to pollutants, and removing people from areas with poor air quality.[121]

A report assisted by the Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance can support in the systematic investigation of individual health problems arising at indoor workplaces, and in the identification of practical solutions.[122]

Source control

[edit]

HVAC design

[edit]

Environmentally sustainable design concepts include aspects of commercial and residential heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) technologies. Among several considerations, one of the topics attended to is the issue of indoor air quality throughout the design and construction stages of a building's life.[citation needed]

One technique to reduce energy consumption while maintaining adequate air quality, is demand-controlled ventilation. Instead of setting throughput at a fixed air replacement rate, carbon dioxide sensors are used to control the rate dynamically, based on the emissions of actual building occupants.[citation needed]

One way of quantitatively ensuring the health of indoor air is by the frequency of effective turnover of interior air by replacement with outside air. In the UK, for example, classrooms are required to have 2.5 outdoor air changes per hour. In halls, gym, dining, and physiotherapy spaces, the ventilation should be sufficient to limit carbon dioxide to 1,500 ppm. In the US, ventilation in classrooms is based on the amount of outdoor air per occupant plus the amount of outdoor air per unit of floor area, not air changes per hour. Since carbon dioxide indoors comes from occupants and outdoor air, the adequacy of ventilation per occupant is indicated by the concentration indoors minus the concentration outdoors. The value of 615 ppm above the outdoor concentration indicates approximately 15 cubic feet per minute of outdoor air per adult occupant doing sedentary office work where outdoor air contains over 400 ppm[123] (global average as of 2023). In classrooms, the requirements in the ASHRAE standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, would typically result in about 3 air changes per hour, depending on the occupant density. As the occupants are not the only source of pollutants, outdoor air ventilation may need to be higher when unusual or strong sources of pollution exist indoors.

When outdoor air is polluted, bringing in more outdoor air can actually worsen the overall quality of the indoor air and exacerbate some occupant symptoms related to outdoor air pollution. Generally, outdoor country air is better than indoor city air.[citation needed]

The use of air filters can trap some of the air pollutants. Portable room air cleaners with HEPA filters can be used if ventilation is poor or outside air has high level of PM 2.5.[122] Air filters are used to reduce the amount of dust that reaches the wet coils.[citation needed] Dust can serve as food to grow molds on the wet coils and ducts and can reduce the efficiency of the coils.[citation needed]

The use of trickle vents on windows is also valuable to maintain constant ventilation. They can help prevent mold and allergen build up in the home or workplace. They can also reduce the spread of some respiratory infections.[124]

Moisture management and humidity control requires operating HVAC systems as designed. Moisture management and humidity control may conflict with efforts to conserve energy. For example, moisture management and humidity control requires systems to be set to supply make-up air at lower temperatures (design levels), instead of the higher temperatures sometimes used to conserve energy in cooling-dominated climate conditions. However, for most of the US and many parts of Europe and Japan, during the majority of hours of the year, outdoor air temperatures are cool enough that the air does not need further cooling to provide thermal comfort indoors.[citation needed] However, high humidity outdoors creates the need for careful attention to humidity levels indoors. High humidity give rise to mold growth and moisture indoors is associated with a higher prevalence of occupant respiratory problems.[citation needed]

The "dew point temperature" is an absolute measure of the moisture in air. Some facilities are being designed with dew points in the lower 50s °F, and some in the upper and lower 40s °F.[citation needed] Some facilities are being designed using desiccant wheels with gas-fired heaters to dry out the wheel enough to get the required dew points.[citation needed] On those systems, after the moisture is removed from the make-up air, a cooling coil is used to lower the temperature to the desired level.[citation needed]

Commercial buildings, and sometimes residential, are often kept under slightly positive air pressure relative to the outdoors to reduce infiltration. Limiting infiltration helps with moisture management and humidity control.

Dilution of indoor pollutants with outdoor air is effective to the extent that outdoor air is free of harmful pollutants. Ozone in outdoor air occurs indoors at reduced concentrations because ozone is highly reactive with many chemicals found indoors. The products of the reactions between ozone and many common indoor pollutants include organic compounds that may be more odorous, irritating, or toxic than those from which they are formed. These products of ozone chemistry include formaldehyde, higher molecular weight aldehydes, acidic aerosols, and fine and ultrafine particles, among others. The higher the outdoor ventilation rate, the higher the indoor ozone concentration and the more likely the reactions will occur, but even at low levels, the reactions will take place. This suggests that ozone should be removed from ventilation air, especially in areas where outdoor ozone levels are frequently high.

Effect of indoor plants

[edit]
Spider plants (Chlorophytum comosum) absorb some airborne contaminants.

Houseplants together with the medium in which they are grown can reduce components of indoor air pollution, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOC) such as benzene, toluene, and xylene. Plants remove CO2 and release oxygen and water, although the quantitative impact for house plants is small. The interest in using potted plants for removing VOCs was sparked by a 1989 NASA study conducted in sealed chambers designed to replicate the environment on space stations. However, these results suffered from poor replication[125] and are not applicable to typical buildings, where outdoor-to-indoor air exchange already removes VOCs at a rate that could only be matched by the placement of 10–1000 plants/m2 of a building's floor space.[126]

Plants also appear to reduce airborne microbes and molds, and to increase humidity.[127] However, the increased humidity can itself lead to increased levels of mold and even VOCs.[128]

Since extremely high humidity is associated with increased mold growth, allergic responses, and respiratory responses, the presence of additional moisture from houseplants may not be desirable in all indoor settings if watering is done inappropriately.[129]

Institutional programs

[edit]
EPA graphic about asthma triggers

The topic of IAQ has become popular due to the greater awareness of health problems caused by mold and triggers to asthma and allergies.

In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an "IAQ Tools for Schools" program to help improve the indoor environmental conditions in educational institutions. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health conducts Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) in workplaces at the request of employees, authorized representative of employees, or employers, to determine whether any substance normally found in the place of employment has potentially toxic effects, including indoor air quality.[130]

A variety of scientists work in the field of indoor air quality, including chemists, physicists, mechanical engineers, biologists, bacteriologists, epidemiologists, and computer scientists. Some of these professionals are certified by organizations such as the American Industrial Hygiene Association, the American Indoor Air Quality Council and the Indoor Environmental Air Quality Council.

In the UK, under the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, the Air Quality Expert Group considers current knowledge on indoor air quality and provides advice to government and devolved administration ministers.[131]

At the international level, the International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ), formed in 1991, organizes two major conferences, the Indoor Air and the Healthy Buildings series.[132]

See also

[edit]
  • Environmental management
  • Healthy building
  • Indoor bioaerosol
  • Microbiomes of the built environment
  • Olfactory fatigue

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Carroll, GT; Kirschman, DL; Mammana, A (2022). "Increased CO2 levels in the operating room correlate with the number of healthcare workers present: an imperative for intentional crowd control". Patient Safety in Surgery. 16 (35): 35. doi:10.1186/s13037-022-00343-8. PMC 9672642. PMID 36397098.
  2. ^ ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, ASHRAE, Inc., Atlanta, GA, US
  3. ^ Belias, Evangelos; Licina, Dusan (2022). "Outdoor PM2. 5 air filtration: optimising indoor air quality and energy". Building & Cities. 3 (1): 186–203. doi:10.5334/bc.153.
  4. ^ KMC Controls (September 24, 2015). "What's Your IQ on IAQ and IEQ?". Archived from the original on April 12, 2021. Retrieved April 12, 2021.[unreliable source?]
  5. ^ Bruce, N; Perez-Padilla, R; Albalak, R (2000). "Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 78 (9): 1078–92. PMC 2560841. PMID 11019457.
  6. ^ "Household air pollution and health: fact sheet". WHO. May 8, 2018. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  7. ^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (2019). "Access to Energy". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on November 1, 2021. Retrieved April 1, 2021. According to the Global Burden of Disease study 1.6 million people died prematurely in 2017 as a result of indoor air pollution ... But it's worth noting that the WHO publishes a substantially larger number of indoor air pollution deaths..
  8. ^ Klepeis, Neil E; Nelson, William C; Ott, Wayne R; Robinson, John P; Tsang, Andy M; Switzer, Paul; Behar, Joseph V; Hern, Stephen C; Engelmann, William H (July 2001). "The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 11 (3): 231–252. Bibcode:2001JESEE..11..231K. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165. PMID 11477521. S2CID 22445147. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
  9. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office equipment: design, indoor air emissions, and pollution prevention opportunities. Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, 1995.
  10. ^ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unfinished business: a comparative assessment of environmental problems, EPA-230/2-87-025a-e (NTIS PB88-127030). Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC, 1987.
  11. ^ Klepeis, Neil E; Nelson, William C; Ott, Wayne R; Robinson, John P; Tsang, Andy M; Switzer, Paul; Behar, Joseph V; Hern, Stephen C; Engelmann, William H (July 1, 2001). "The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 11 (3): 231–252. Bibcode:2001JESEE..11..231K. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165. ISSN 1559-0631. PMID 11477521. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  12. ^ "Combined or multiple exposure to health stressors in indoor built environments: an evidence-based review prepared for the WHO training workshop "Multiple environmental exposures and risks": 16–18 October 2013, Bonn, Germany". World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2014. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  13. ^ "Household air pollution". World Health Organization. December 15, 2023. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  14. ^ Clark, Sierra N.; Lam, Holly C. Y.; Goode, Emma-Jane; Marczylo, Emma L.; Exley, Karen S.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (August 2, 2023). "The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp and Mould in English Housing". Environments. 10 (8): 136. doi:10.3390/environments10080136. ISSN 2076-3298.
  15. ^ "Chief Medical Officer (CMO): annual reports". GOV.UK. November 16, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  16. ^ "Project information | Indoor air quality at home | Quality standards | NICE". www.nice.org.uk. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  17. ^ "The inside story: Health effects of indoor air quality on children and young people". RCPCH. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  18. ^ Halios, Christos H.; Landeg-Cox, Charlotte; Lowther, Scott D.; Middleton, Alice; Marczylo, Tim; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (September 15, 2022). "Chemicals in European residences – Part I: A review of emissions, concentrations and health effects of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)". Science of the Total Environment. 839: 156201. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.83956201H. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156201. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 35623519.
  19. ^ "Literature review on chemical pollutants in indoor air in public settings for children and overview of their health effects with a focus on schools, kindergartens and day-care centres". www.who.int. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  20. ^ Burge, P S (February 2004). "Sick building syndrome". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 61 (2): 185–190. doi:10.1136/oem.2003.008813. PMC 1740708. PMID 14739390.
  21. ^ Apte, K; Salvi, S (2016). "Household air pollution and its effects on health". F1000Research. 5: 2593. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7552.1. PMC 5089137. PMID 27853506. Burning of natural gas not only produces a variety of gases such as sulfur oxides, mercury compounds, and particulate matter but also leads to the production of nitrogen oxides, primarily nitrogen dioxide...The burning of biomass fuel or any other fossil fuel increases the concentration of black carbon in the air
  22. ^ "Improved Clean Cookstoves". Project Drawdown. February 7, 2020. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  23. ^ WHO indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2014. ISBN 978-92-4-154888-5.
  24. ^ "Clearing the Air: Gas Cooking and Pollution in European Homes". CLASP. November 8, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  25. ^ Seals, Brady; Krasner, Andee. "Gas Stoves: Health and Air Quality Impacts and Solutions". RMI. Retrieved May 5, 2024.
  26. ^ a b c Myers, Isabella (February 2022). The efficient operation of regulation and legislation: An holistic approach to understanding the effect of Carbon Monoxide on mortality (PDF). CO Research Trust.
  27. ^ a b c Penney, David; Benignus, Vernon; Kephalopoulos, Stylianos; Kotzias, Dimitrios; Kleinman, Michael; Verrier, Agnes (2010), "Carbon monoxide", WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants, World Health Organization, ISBN 978-92-890-0213-4, OCLC 696099951, archived from the original on March 8, 2021, retrieved March 18, 2024
  28. ^ "Carbon monoxide: toxicological overview". UK Health Security Agency. May 24, 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  29. ^ a b c WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide (PDF). World Health Organization. 2021. hdl:10665/345329. ISBN 978-92-4-003422-8.[page needed]
  30. ^ a b Soleimani, Farshid; Dobaradaran, Sina; De-la-Torre, Gabriel E.; Schmidt, Torsten C.; Saeedi, Reza (March 2022). "Content of toxic components of cigarette, cigarette smoke vs cigarette butts: A comprehensive systematic review". Science of the Total Environment. 813: 152667. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.81352667S. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152667. PMID 34963586.
  31. ^ "Considering smoking as an air pollution problem for environmental health | Environmental Performance Index". Archived from the original on September 25, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  32. ^ Arfaeinia, Hossein; Ghaemi, Maryam; Jahantigh, Anis; Soleimani, Farshid; Hashemi, Hassan (June 12, 2023). "Secondhand and thirdhand smoke: a review on chemical contents, exposure routes, and protective strategies". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (32): 78017–78029. Bibcode:2023ESPR...3078017A. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28128-1. PMC 10258487. PMID 37306877.
  33. ^ Arfaeinia, Hossein; Ghaemi, Maryam; Jahantigh, Anis; Soleimani, Farshid; Hashemi, Hassan (June 12, 2023). "Secondhand and thirdhand smoke: a review on chemical contents, exposure routes, and protective strategies". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30 (32): 78017–78029. Bibcode:2023ESPR...3078017A. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28128-1. ISSN 1614-7499. PMC 10258487. PMID 37306877.
  34. ^ Health, CDC's Office on Smoking and (May 9, 2018). "Smoking and Tobacco Use; Fact Sheet; Secondhand Smoke". Smoking and Tobacco Use. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  35. ^ Fernández, E; Ballbè, M; Sureda, X; Fu, M; Saltó, E; Martínez-Sánchez, JM (December 2015). "Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study". Current Environmental Health Reports. 2 (4): 423–9. Bibcode:2015CEHR....2..423F. doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0072-x. PMID 26452675.
  36. ^ Vu, Tuan V.; Harrison, Roy M. (May 8, 2019). "Chemical and Physical Properties of Indoor Aerosols". In Harrison, R. M.; Hester, R. E. (eds.). Indoor Air Pollution. The Royal Society of Chemistry (published 2019). ISBN 978-1-78801-803-6.
  37. ^ Abdullahi, Karimatu L.; Delgado-Saborit, Juana Maria; Harrison, Roy M. (February 13, 2013). "Emissions and indoor concentrations of particulate matter and its specific chemical components from cooking: A review". Atmospheric Environment. 71: 260–294. Bibcode:2013AtmEn..71..260A. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.061. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  38. ^ Patel, Sameer; Sankhyan, Sumit; Boedicker, Erin K.; DeCarlo, Peter F.; Farmer, Delphine K.; Goldstein, Allen H.; Katz, Erin F.; Nazaroff, William W; Tian, Yilin; Vanhanen, Joonas; Vance, Marina E. (June 16, 2020). "Indoor Particulate Matter during HOMEChem: Concentrations, Size Distributions, and Exposures". Environmental Science & Technology. 54 (12): 7107–7116. Bibcode:2020EnST...54.7107P. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00740. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 32391692. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  39. ^ Thangavel, Prakash; Park, Duckshin; Lee, Young-Chul (June 19, 2022). "Recent Insights into Particulate Matter (PM2.5)-Mediated Toxicity in Humans: An Overview". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (12): 7511. doi:10.3390/ijerph19127511. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 9223652. PMID 35742761.
  40. ^ You, Bo; Zhou, Wei; Li, Junyao; Li, Zhijie; Sun, Yele (November 4, 2022). "A review of indoor Gaseous organic compounds and human chemical Exposure: Insights from Real-time measurements". Environment International. 170: 107611. Bibcode:2022EnInt.17007611Y. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107611. PMID 36335895.
  41. ^ Weschler, Charles J.; Carslaw, Nicola (March 6, 2018). "Indoor Chemistry". Environmental Science & Technology. 52 (5): 2419–2428. Bibcode:2018EnST...52.2419W. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b06387. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 29402076. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  42. ^ a b Carter, Toby J.; Poppendieck, Dustin G.; Shaw, David; Carslaw, Nicola (January 16, 2023). "A Modelling Study of Indoor Air Chemistry: The Surface Interactions of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide". Atmospheric Environment. 297: 119598. Bibcode:2023AtmEn.29719598C. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119598.
  43. ^ Tsai, Wen-Tien (March 26, 2019). "An overview of health hazards of volatile organic compounds regulated as indoor air pollutants". Reviews on Environmental Health. 34 (1): 81–89. doi:10.1515/reveh-2018-0046. PMID 30854833.
  44. ^ "U.S. EPA IAQ – Organic chemicals". Epa.gov. August 5, 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  45. ^ a b Davies, Helen L.; O'Leary, Catherine; Dillon, Terry; Shaw, David R.; Shaw, Marvin; Mehra, Archit; Phillips, Gavin; Carslaw, Nicola (August 14, 2023). "A measurement and modelling investigation of the indoor air chemistry following cooking activities". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 25 (9): 1532–1548. doi:10.1039/D3EM00167A. ISSN 2050-7887. PMID 37609942.
  46. ^ a b c Harding-Smith, Ellen; Shaw, David R.; Shaw, Marvin; Dillon, Terry J.; Carslaw, Nicola (January 23, 2024). "Does green mean clean? Volatile organic emissions from regular versus green cleaning products". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 26 (2): 436–450. doi:10.1039/D3EM00439B. ISSN 2050-7887. PMID 38258874.
  47. ^ Lebel, Eric D.; Michanowicz, Drew R.; Bilsback, Kelsey R.; Hill, Lee Ann L.; Goldman, Jackson S. W.; Domen, Jeremy K.; Jaeger, Jessie M.; Ruiz, Angélica; Shonkoff, Seth B. C. (November 15, 2022). "Composition, Emissions, and Air Quality Impacts of Hazardous Air Pollutants in Unburned Natural Gas from Residential Stoves in California". Environmental Science & Technology. 56 (22): 15828–15838. Bibcode:2022EnST...5615828L. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c02581. ISSN 0013-936X. PMC 9671046. PMID 36263944.
  48. ^ "Volatile Organic Compounds' Impact on Indoor Air Quality". United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 18, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
  49. ^ "About VOCs". January 21, 2013. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  50. ^ Oanh, Nguyen Thi Kim; Hung, Yung-Tse (2005). "Indoor Air Pollution Control". Advanced Air and Noise Pollution Control. Handbook of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 2. pp. 237–272. doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-779-6_7. ISBN 978-1-58829-359-6.
  51. ^ "Emicode". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  52. ^ "M1". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  53. ^ "Blue Angel". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  54. ^ "Indoor Air Comfort". Indoor Air Comfort. Archived from the original on February 1, 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  55. ^ "CDPH Section 01350". Eurofins.com. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved March 2, 2012.
  56. ^ a b "Smelly Moldy Houses". Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved August 2, 2014.
  57. ^ Meruva, N. K.; Penn, J. M.; Farthing, D. E. (November 2004). "Rapid identification of microbial VOCs from tobacco molds using closed-loop stripping and gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry". J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 31 (10): 482–8. doi:10.1007/s10295-004-0175-0. PMID 15517467. S2CID 32543591.
  58. ^ "Atmospheric carbon dioxide passes 400 ppm everywhere". Physics Today (6): 8170. 2016. Bibcode:2016PhT..2016f8170.. doi:10.1063/pt.5.029904.
  59. ^ Xie Y, Li Y, Feng Y, Cheng W, Wang Y (April 2022). "Inhalable microplastics prevails in air: Exploring the size detection limit". Environ Int. 162: 107151. Bibcode:2022EnInt.16207151X. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107151. PMID 35228011.
  60. ^ Liu C, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang L, Deng J, Gao Y, Yu L, Zhang J, Sun H (July 2019). "Widespread distribution of PET and PC microplastics in dust in urban China and their estimated human exposure". Environ Int. 128: 116–124. Bibcode:2019EnInt.128..116L. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.024. PMID 31039519.
  61. ^ Yuk, Hyeonseong; Jo, Ho Hyeon; Nam, Jihee; Kim, Young Uk; Kim, Sumin (2022). "Microplastic: A particulate matter(PM) generated by deterioration of building materials". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 437. Elsevier BV: 129290. Bibcode:2022JHzM..43729290Y. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129290. ISSN 0304-3894. PMID 35753297.
  62. ^ Eberhard, Tiffany; Casillas, Gaston; Zarus, Gregory M.; Barr, Dana Boyd (January 6, 2024). "Systematic review of microplastics and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor air: identifying a framework and data needs for quantifying human inhalation exposures" (PDF). Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 34 (2). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 185–196. doi:10.1038/s41370-023-00634-x. ISSN 1559-0631. Retrieved December 19, 2024. MPs have been found in water and soil, and recent research is exposing the vast amount of them in ambient and indoor air.
  63. ^ Gasperi, Johnny; Wright, Stephanie L.; Dris, Rachid; Collard, France; Mandin, Corinne; Guerrouache, Mohamed; Langlois, Valérie; Kelly, Frank J.; Tassin, Bruno (2018). "Microplastics in air: Are we breathing it in?" (PDF). Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health. 1: 1–5. Bibcode:2018COESH...1....1G. doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002. S2CID 133750509. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 6, 2020. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
  64. ^ Prasittisopin, Lapyote; Ferdous, Wahid; Kamchoom, Viroon (2023). "Microplastics in construction and built environment". Developments in the Built Environment. 15. Elsevier BV. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100188. ISSN 2666-1659.
  65. ^ Galloway, Nanette LoBiondo (September 13, 2024). "Ventnor introduces ordinance to control microplastics contamination". DownBeach. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
  66. ^ Weschler, Charles J. (December 2000). "Ozone in Indoor Environments: Concentration and Chemistry: Ozone in Indoor Environments". Indoor Air. 10 (4): 269–288. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004269.x. PMID 11089331. Archived from the original on April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  67. ^ Weschler, Charles J.; Nazaroff, William W (February 22, 2023). "Human skin oil: a major ozone reactant indoors". Environmental Science: Atmospheres. 3 (4): 640–661. doi:10.1039/D3EA00008G. ISSN 2634-3606. Archived from the original on April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  68. ^ Kumar, Prashant; Kalaiarasan, Gopinath; Porter, Alexandra E.; Pinna, Alessandra; KÅ‚osowski, MichaÅ‚ M.; Demokritou, Philip; Chung, Kian Fan; Pain, Christopher; Arvind, D. K.; Arcucci, Rossella; Adcock, Ian M.; Dilliway, Claire (February 20, 2021). "An overview of methods of fine and ultrafine particle collection for physicochemical characterisation and toxicity assessments". Science of the Total Environment. 756: 143553. Bibcode:2021ScTEn.75643553K. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143553. hdl:10044/1/84518. PMID 33239200. S2CID 227176222.
  69. ^ Apte, M. G.; Buchanan, I. S. H.; Mendell, M. J. (April 2008). "Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study". Indoor Air. 18 (2): 156–170. Bibcode:2008InAir..18..156A. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00521.x. PMID 18333994.
  70. ^ "Eight-hour Average Ozone Concentrations | Ground-level Ozone | New England | US EPA". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  71. ^ a b c Park, J. H.; Cox-Ganser, J. M. (2011). "Meta-Mold exposure and respiratory health in damp indoor environments". Frontiers in Bioscience. 3 (2): 757–771. doi:10.2741/e284. PMID 21196349.
  72. ^ "CDC – Mold – General Information – Facts About Mold and Dampness". December 4, 2018. Archived from the original on December 16, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2017.
  73. ^ Singh, Dr Jagjit; Singh, Jagjit, eds. (1994). Building Mycology (1 ed.). Taylor & Francis. doi:10.4324/9780203974735. ISBN 978-1-135-82462-4.
  74. ^ a b Clarke, J.A; Johnstone, C.M; Kelly, N.J; McLean, R.C; anderson, J.A; Rowan, N.J; Smith, J.E (January 20, 1999). "A technique for the prediction of the conditions leading to mould growth in buildings". Building and Environment. 34 (4): 515–521. Bibcode:1999BuEnv..34..515C. doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00023-7. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  75. ^ Vereecken, Evy; Roels, Staf (November 15, 2011). "Review of mould prediction models and their influence on mould risk evaluation". Building and Environment. 51: 296–310. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.003. Archived from the original on March 2, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  76. ^ BS 5250:2021 - Management of moisture in buildings. Code of practice. British Standards Institution (BSI). October 31, 2021. ISBN 978-0-539-18975-9.
  77. ^ Madgwick, Della; Wood, Hannah (August 8, 2016). "The problem of clothes drying in new homes in the UK". Structural Survey. 34 (4/5): 320–330. doi:10.1108/SS-10-2015-0048. ISSN 0263-080X. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  78. ^ May, Neil; McGilligan, Charles; Ucci, Marcella (2017). "Health and Moisture in Buildings" (PDF). UK Centre for Moisture in Buildings. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 11, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  79. ^ "Understanding and addressing the health risks of damp and mould in the home". GOV.UK. September 7, 2023. Archived from the original on April 10, 2024. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
  80. ^ Clark, Sierra N.; Lam, Holly C. Y.; Goode, Emma-Jane; Marczylo, Emma L.; Exley, Karen S.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani (August 2, 2023). "The Burden of Respiratory Disease from Formaldehyde, Damp and Mould in English Housing". Environments. 10 (8): 136. doi:10.3390/environments10080136. ISSN 2076-3298.
  81. ^ Microbiology of the Indoor Environment Archived July 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, microbe.net
  82. ^ http://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/pdf/amoy_e.pdf
  83. ^ https://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/graphics/amoyannex.jpg
  84. ^ "Progress in Global Surveillance and Response Capacity 10 Years after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome". environmental contamination with SARS CoV RNA was identified on the carpet in front of the index case-patient's room and 3 nearby rooms (and on their door frames but not inside the rooms) and in the air intake vents near the centrally located elevators ... secondary infections occurred not in guest rooms but in the common areas of the ninth floor, such as the corridor or elevator hall. These areas could have been contaminated through body fluids (e.g., vomitus, expectorated sputum), respiratory droplets, or suspended small-particle aerosols generated by the index case-patient; other guests were then infected by fomites or aerosols while passing through these same areas. Efficient spread of SARS CoV through small-particle aerosols was observed in several superspreading events in health care settings, during an airplane flight, and in an apartment complex (12–14,16–19). This process of environmental contamination that generated infectious aerosols likely best explains the pattern of disease transmission at the Hotel Metropole.
  85. ^ Azuma, Kenichi; Kagi, Naoki; Yanagi, U.; Osawa, Haruki (December 2018). "Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance". Environment International. 121 (Pt 1): 51–56. Bibcode:2018EnInt.121...51A. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.059. PMID 30172928.
  86. ^ Du, Bowen; Tandoc, Michael (June 19, 2020). "Indoor CO2 concentrations and cognitive function: A critical review". International Journal of Indoor Environment and Health. 30 (6): 1067–1082. Bibcode:2020InAir..30.1067D. doi:10.1111/ina.12706. PMID 32557862. S2CID 219915861.
  87. ^ Fan, Yuejie; Cao, Xiaodong; Zhang, Jie; Lai, Dayi; Pang, Liping (June 1, 2023). "Short-term exposure to indoor carbon dioxide and cognitive task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Building and Environment. 237: 110331. Bibcode:2023BuEnv.23710331F. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110331.
  88. ^ a b Lowther, Scott D.; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; Foxall, Kerry; Shrubsole, Clive; Cheek, Emily; Gadeberg, Britta; Sepai, Ovnair (November 16, 2021). "Low Level Carbon Dioxide Indoors—A Pollution Indicator or a Pollutant? A Health-Based Perspective". Environments. 8 (11): 125. doi:10.3390/environments8110125. ISSN 2076-3298.
  89. ^ Persily, Andrew (July 2022). "Development and application of an indoor carbon dioxide metric". Indoor Air. 32 (7): e13059. doi:10.1111/ina.13059. PMID 35904382.
  90. ^ "Indoor Environmental Quality: HVAC Management | NIOSH | CDC". www.cdc.gov. February 25, 2022. Archived from the original on April 1, 2022. Retrieved April 1, 2022.
  91. ^ Indoor Environmental Quality: Building Ventilation Archived January 20, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Accessed October 8, 2008.
  92. ^ "SAMHE - Schools' Air quality Monitoring for Health and Education". samhe.org.uk. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  93. ^ "Document Display | NEPIS | US EPA". nepis.epa.gov. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
  94. ^ Zeeb & Shannoun 2009, p. 3.
  95. ^ C.Michael Hogan and Sjaak Slanina. 2010, Air pollution. Encyclopedia of Earth Archived October 12, 2006, at the Wayback Machine. eds. Sidney Draggan and Cutler Cleveland. National Council for Science and the Environment. Washington DC
  96. ^ "Radon Mitigation Methods". Radon Solution—Raising Radon Awareness. Archived from the original on December 15, 2008. Retrieved December 2, 2008.
  97. ^ Zeeb & Shannoun 2009, p. [page needed].
  98. ^ "Basic radon facts" (PDF). US Environmental Protection Agency. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 13, 2022. Retrieved September 18, 2018. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  99. ^ "Radon Action Level and Target Level". UKradon. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  100. ^ "Radon Zone Map (with State Information)". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on April 1, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  101. ^ "UK maps of radon". UKradon. Archived from the original on March 7, 2024. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  102. ^ "Radon map of Australia". Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). Archived from the original on March 20, 2024. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
  103. ^ "Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis". Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 26, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  104. ^ Chen, Guochao; Qiu, Minghao; Wang, Peng; Zhang, Yuqiang; Shindell, Drew; Zhang, Hongliang (July 19, 2024). "Continuous wildfires threaten public and ecosystem health under climate change across continents". Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 18 (10). doi:10.1007/s11783-024-1890-6. ISSN 2095-2201.
  105. ^ Gherasim, Alina; Lee, Alison G.; Bernstein, Jonathan A. (November 14, 2023). "Impact of Climate Change on Indoor Air Quality". Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. 44 (1): 55–73. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2023.09.001. PMID 37973260. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  106. ^ Lacressonnière, Gwendoline; Watson, Laura; Gauss, Michael; Engardt, Magnuz; Andersson, Camilla; Beekmann, Matthias; Colette, Augustin; Foret, Gilles; Josse, Béatrice; Marécal, Virginie; Nyiri, Agnes; Siour, Guillaume; Sobolowski, Stefan; Vautard, Robert (February 1, 2017). "Particulate matter air pollution in Europe in a +2 °C warming world". Atmospheric Environment. 154: 129–140. Bibcode:2017AtmEn.154..129L. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.037. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  107. ^ Lee, J; Lewis, A; Monks, P; Jacob, M; Hamilton, J; Hopkins, J; Watson, N; Saxton, J; Ennis, C; Carpenter, L (September 26, 2006). "Ozone photochemistry and elevated isoprene during the UK heatwave of august 2003". Atmospheric Environment. 40 (39): 7598–7613. Bibcode:2006AtmEn..40.7598L. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.057. Archived from the original on October 26, 2022. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  108. ^ Salthammer, Tunga; Schieweck, Alexandra; Gu, Jianwei; Ameri, Shaghayegh; Uhde, Erik (August 7, 2018). "Future trends in ambient air pollution and climate in Germany – Implications for the indoor environment". Building and Environment. 143: 661–670. Bibcode:2018BuEnv.143..661S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.050.
  109. ^ Zhong, L.; Lee, C.-S.; Haghighat, F. (December 1, 2016). "Indoor ozone and climate change". Sustainable Cities and Society. 28: 466–472. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.020. Archived from the original on November 28, 2022. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  110. ^ Zhao, Jiangyue; Uhde, Erik; Salthammer, Tunga; Antretter, Florian; Shaw, David; Carslaw, Nicola; Schieweck, Alexandra (December 9, 2023). "Long-term prediction of the effects of climate change on indoor climate and air quality". Environmental Research. 243: 117804. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.117804. PMID 38042519.
  111. ^ Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène (March 16, 2022). "Latest Trends in Pollutant Accumulations at Threatening Levels in Energy-Efficient Residential Buildings with and without Mechanical Ventilation: A Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (6): 3538. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063538. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8951331. PMID 35329223.
  112. ^ UK Health Security Agency (2024) [1 September 2012]. "Chapter 5: Impact of climate change policies on indoor environmental quality and health in UK housing". Health Effects of Climate Change (HECC) in the UK: 2023 report (published January 15, 2024).
  113. ^ World Health Organization, ed. (2010). Who guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Copenhagen: WHO. ISBN 978-92-890-0213-4. OCLC 696099951.
  114. ^ "Air quality: UK guidelines for volatile organic compounds in indoor spaces". Public Health England. September 13, 2019. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  115. ^ "Home - IEQ Guidelines". ieqguidelines.org. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
  116. ^ Toyinbo, Oluyemi; Hägerhed, Linda; Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; Dudzinska, Marzenna; Emmerich, Steven; Hemming, David; Park, Ju-Hyeong; Haverinen-Shaughnessy, Ulla; the Scientific Technical Committee 34 of the International Society of Indoor Air Quality, Climate (April 19, 2022). "Open database for international and national indoor environmental quality guidelines". Indoor Air. 32 (4): e13028. doi:10.1111/ina.13028. ISSN 0905-6947. PMC 11099937. PMID 35481936.cite journal: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  117. ^ Dimitroulopoulou, Sani; DudziÅ„ska, Marzenna R.; Gunnarsen, Lars; Hägerhed, Linda; Maula, Henna; Singh, Raja; Toyinbo, Oluyemi; Haverinen-Shaughnessy, Ulla (August 4, 2023). "Indoor air quality guidelines from across the world: An appraisal considering energy saving, health, productivity, and comfort". Environment International. 178: 108127. Bibcode:2023EnInt.17808127D. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108127. PMID 37544267.
  118. ^ Pitarma, Rui; Marques, Gonçalo; Ferreira, Bárbara Roque (February 2017). "Monitoring Indoor Air Quality for Enhanced Occupational Health". Journal of Medical Systems. 41 (2): 23. doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0667-2. PMID 28000117. S2CID 7372403.
  119. ^ Wyon, D. P. (August 2004). "The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity: The effects of IAQ on performance and productivity". Indoor Air. 14: 92–101. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00278.x. PMID 15330777.
  120. ^ Son, Young Joo; Pope, Zachary C.; Pantelic, Jovan (September 2023). "Perceived air quality and satisfaction during implementation of an automated indoor air quality monitoring and control system". Building and Environment. 243: 110713. Bibcode:2023BuEnv.24310713S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110713.
  121. ^ IAQM (2021). Indoor Air Quality Guidance: Assessment, Monitoring, Modelling and Mitigation (PDF) (Version 0.1 ed.). London: Institute of Air Quality Management.
  122. ^ a b Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance. "Indoor workplaces – Recommended procedure for the investigation of working environment". Archived from the original on November 3, 2021. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
  123. ^ "Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide | NOAA Climate.gov". www.climate.gov. April 9, 2024. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
  124. ^ "Ventilation to reduce the spread of respiratory infections, including COVID-19". GOV.UK. August 2, 2022. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  125. ^ Dela Cruz, Majbrit; Christensen, Jan H.; Thomsen, Jane Dyrhauge; Müller, Renate (December 2014). "Can ornamental potted plants remove volatile organic compounds from indoor air? — a review". Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21 (24): 13909–13928. Bibcode:2014ESPR...2113909D. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3240-x. PMID 25056742. S2CID 207272189.
  126. ^ Cummings, Bryan E.; Waring, Michael S. (March 2020). "Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies". Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 30 (2): 253–261. Bibcode:2020JESEE..30..253C. doi:10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9. PMID 31695112. S2CID 207911697.
  127. ^ Wolverton, B. C.; Wolverton, J. D. (1996). "Interior plants: their influence on airborne microbes inside energy-efficient buildings". Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Sciences. 41 (2): 100–105.
  128. ^ US EPA, OAR (July 16, 2013). "Mold". US EPA. Archived from the original on May 18, 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
  129. ^ Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Damp Indoor Spaces and Health (2004). Damp Indoor Spaces and Health. National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-09193-0. PMID 25009878. Archived from the original on January 19, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2024.[page needed]
  130. ^ "Indoor Environmental Quality". Washington, DC: US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
  131. ^ Lewis, Alastair C; Allan, James; Carslaw, David; Carruthers, David; Fuller, Gary; Harrison, Roy; Heal, Mathew; Nemitz, Eiko; Reeves, Claire (2022). Indoor Air Quality (PDF) (Report). Air Quality Expert Group. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6523605. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  132. ^ "Isiaq.Org". International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate. Archived from the original on January 21, 2022. Retrieved March 2, 2012.

Sources

[edit]
Monographs
  • May, Jeffrey C.; Connie L. May; Ouellette, John J.; Reed, Charles E. (2004). The mold survival guide for your home and for your health. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-7938-8.
  • May, Jeffrey C. (2001). My house is killing me! : the home guide for families with allergies and asthma. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6730-9.
  • May, Jeffrey C. (2006). My office is killing me! : the sick building survival guide. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-8342-2.
  • Salthammer, T., ed. (1999). Organic Indoor Air Pollutants — Occurrence, Measurement, Evaluation. Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-29622-4.
  • Spengler, J.D.; Samet, J.M. (1991). Indoor air pollution: A health perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-4125-5.
  • Samet, J.M.; McCarthy, J.F. (2001). Indoor Air Quality Handbook. NY: McGraw–Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-445549-4.
  • Tichenor, B. (1996). Characterizing Sources of Indoor Air Pollution and Related Sink Effects. ASTM STP 1287. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. ISBN 978-0-8031-2030-3.
  • Zeeb, Hajo; Shannoun, Ferid, eds. (2009). WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-154767-3. PMID 23762967. NBK143216. Archived from the original on March 30, 2024. Retrieved March 30, 2024.
Articles, radio segments, web pages
  • Apte, M. G.; Buchanan, I. S. H.; Mendell, M. J. (April 2008). "Outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study". Indoor Air. 18 (2): 156–170. Bibcode:2008InAir..18..156A. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00521.x. PMID 18333994.
  • Bad In-Flight Air Exacerbated by Passengers Archived December 15, 2021, at the Wayback Machine, Talk of the Nation, National Public Radio, September 21, 2007.
  • Indoor Air Pollution index page, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Steinemann, Anne (2017). "Ten questions concerning air fresheners and indoor built environments". Building and Environment. 111: 279–284. Bibcode:2017BuEnv.111..279S. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.009. hdl:11343/121890.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Lin, Y.; Zou, J.; Yang, W.; Li, C. Q. (2018). "A Review of Recent Advances in Research on PM2.5 in China". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (3): 438. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030438. PMC 5876983. PMID 29498704.
  • Abdel Hameed, A. A.; Yasser, I. H.; Khoder, I. M. (2004). "Indoor air quality during renovation actions: a case study". Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 6 (9): 740–744. doi:10.1039/b402995j. PMID 15346177.
[edit]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency info on IAQ
  • Best Practices for Indoor Air Quality when Remodeling Your Home, US EPA
  • Addressing Indoor Environmental Concerns During Remodeling, US EPA
  • Renovation and Repair, Part of Indoor Air Quality Design Tools for Schools, US EPA
  • The 9 Foundations of a Healthy Building, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

 

(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Refrigerant based Fan-Coil Unit. Other variants utilize a chilled, or heated water loop for space cooling, or heating, respectively.
 
 

A fan coil unit (FCU), also known as a Vertical Fan Coil Unit (VFCU), is a device consisting of a heat exchanger (coil) and a fan. FCUs are commonly used in HVAC systems of residential, commercial, and industrial buildings that use ducted split air conditioning or central plant cooling. FCUs are typically connected to ductwork and a thermostat to regulate the temperature of one or more spaces and to assist the main air handling unit for each space if used with chillers. The thermostat controls the fan speed and/or the flow of water or refrigerant to the heat exchanger using a control valve.

Due to their simplicity, flexibility, and easy maintenance, fan coil units can be more economical to install than ducted 100% fresh air systems (VAV) or central heating systems with air handling units or chilled beams. FCUs come in various configurations, including horizontal (ceiling-mounted) and vertical (floor-mounted), and can be used in a wide range of applications, from small residential units to large commercial and industrial buildings.

Noise output from FCUs, like any other form of air conditioning, depends on the design of the unit and the building materials surrounding it. Some FCUs offer noise levels as low as NR25 or NC25.

The output from an FCU can be established by looking at the temperature of the air entering the unit and the temperature of the air leaving the unit, coupled with the volume of air being moved through the unit. This is a simplistic statement, and there is further reading on sensible heat ratios and the specific heat capacity of air, both of which have an effect on thermal performance.

Design and operation

[edit]

Fan Coil Unit covers a range of products and will mean different things to users, specifiers, and installers in different countries and regions, particularly in relation to product size and output capability.

Fan Coil Unit falls principally into two main types: blow through and draw through. As the names suggest, in the first type the fans are fitted behind the heat exchanger, and in the other type the fans are fitted in front the coil such that they draw air through it. Draw through units are considered thermally superior, as ordinarily they make better use of the heat exchanger. However they are more expensive, as they require a chassis to hold the fans whereas a blow-through unit typically consists of a set of fans bolted straight to a coil.

A fan coil unit may be concealed or exposed within the room or area that it serves.

An exposed fan coil unit may be wall-mounted, freestanding or ceiling mounted, and will typically include an appropriate enclosure to protect and conceal the fan coil unit itself, with return air grille and supply air diffuser set into that enclosure to distribute the air.

A concealed fan coil unit will typically be installed within an accessible ceiling void or services zone. The return air grille and supply air diffuser, typically set flush into the ceiling, will be ducted to and from the fan coil unit and thus allows a great degree of flexibility for locating the grilles to suit the ceiling layout and/or the partition layout within a space. It is quite common for the return air not to be ducted and to use the ceiling void as a return air plenum.

The coil receives hot or cold water from a central plant, and removes heat from or adds heat to the air through heat transfer. Traditionally fan coil units can contain their own internal thermostat, or can be wired to operate with a remote thermostat. However, and as is common in most modern buildings with a Building Energy Management System (BEMS), the control of the fan coil unit will be by a local digital controller or outstation (along with associated room temperature sensor and control valve actuators) linked to the BEMS via a communication network, and therefore adjustable and controllable from a central point, such as a supervisors head end computer.

Fan coil units circulate hot or cold water through a coil in order to condition a space. The unit gets its hot or cold water from a central plant, or mechanical room containing equipment for removing heat from the central building's closed-loop. The equipment used can consist of machines used to remove heat such as a chiller or a cooling tower and equipment for adding heat to the building's water such as a boiler or a commercial water heater.

Hydronic fan coil units can be generally divided into two types: Two-pipe fan coil units or four-pipe fan coil units. Two-pipe fan coil units have one supply and one return pipe. The supply pipe supplies either cold or hot water to the unit depending on the time of year. Four-pipe fan coil units have two supply pipes and two return pipes. This allows either hot or cold water to enter the unit at any given time. Since it is often necessary to heat and cool different areas of a building at the same time, due to differences in internal heat loss or heat gains, the four-pipe fan coil unit is most commonly used.

Fan coil units may be connected to piping networks using various topology designs, such as "direct return", "reverse return", or "series decoupled". See ASHRAE Handbook "2008 Systems & Equipment", Chapter 12.

Depending upon the selected chilled water temperatures and the relative humidity of the space, it's likely that the cooling coil will dehumidify the entering air stream, and as a by product of this process, it will at times produce a condensate which will need to be carried to drain. The fan coil unit will contain a purpose designed drip tray with drain connection for this purpose. The simplest means to drain the condensate from multiple fan coil units will be by a network of pipework laid to falls to a suitable point. Alternatively a condensate pump may be employed where space for such gravity pipework is limited.

The fan motors within a fan coil unit are responsible for regulating the desired heating and cooling output of the unit. Different manufacturers employ various methods for controlling the motor speed. Some utilize an AC transformer, adjusting the taps to modulate the power supplied to the fan motor. This adjustment is typically performed during the commissioning stage of building construction and remains fixed for the lifespan of the unit.

Alternatively, certain manufacturers employ custom-wound Permanent Split Capacitor (PSC) motors with speed taps in the windings. These taps are set to the desired speed levels for the specific design of the fan coil unit. To enable local control, a simple speed selector switch (Off-High-Medium-Low) is provided for the occupants of the room. This switch is often integrated into the room thermostat and can be manually set or automatically controlled by a digital room thermostat.

For automatic fan speed and temperature control, Building Energy Management Systems are employed. The fan motors commonly used in these units are typically AC Shaded Pole or Permanent Split Capacitor motors. Recent advancements include the use of brushless DC designs with electronic commutation. Compared to units equipped with asynchronous 3-speed motors, fan coil units utilizing brushless motors can reduce power consumption by up to 70%.[1]

Fan coil units linked to ducted split air conditioning units use refrigerant in the cooling coil instead of chilled coolant and linked to a large condenser unit instead of a chiller. They might also be linked to liquid-cooled condenser units which use an intermediate coolant to cool the condenser using cooling towers.

DC/EC motor powered units

[edit]

These motors are sometimes called DC motors, sometimes EC motors and occasionally DC/EC motors. DC stands for direct current and EC stands for electronically commutated.

DC motors allow the speed of the fans within a fan coil unit to be controlled by means of a 0-10 Volt input control signal to the motor/s, the transformers and speed switches associated with AC fan coils are not required. Up to a signal voltage of 2.5 Volts (which may vary with different fan/motor manufacturers) the fan will be in a stopped condition but as the signal voltage is increased, the fan will seamlessly increase in speed until the maximum is reached at a signal Voltage of 10 Volts. fan coils will generally operate between approximately 4 Volts and 7.5 Volts because below 4 Volts the air volumes are ineffective and above 7.5 Volts the fan coil is likely to be too noisy for most commercial applications.

The 0-10 Volt signal voltage can be set via a simple potentiometer and left or the 0-10 Volt signal voltage can be delivered to the fan motors by the terminal controller on each of the Fan Coil Units. The former is very simple and cheap but the latter opens up the opportunity to continuously alter the fan speed depending on various external conditions/influences. These conditions/criteria could be the 'real time' demand for either heating or cooling, occupancy levels, window switches, time clocks or any number of other inputs from either the unit itself, the Building Management System or both.

The reason that these DC Fan Coil Units are, despite their apparent relative complexity, becoming more popular is their improved energy efficiency levels compared to their AC motor-driven counterparts of only a few years ago. A straight swap, AC to DC, will reduce electrical consumption by 50% but applying Demand and Occupancy dependent fan speed control can take the savings to as much as 80%. In areas of the world where there are legally enforceable energy efficiency requirements for fan coils (such as the UK), DC Fan Coil Units are rapidly becoming the only choice.

Areas of use

[edit]
 
 

In high-rise buildings, fan coils may be vertically stacked, located one above the other from floor to floor and all interconnected by the same piping loop.

Fan coil units are an excellent delivery mechanism for hydronic chiller boiler systems in large residential and light commercial applications. In these applications the fan coil units are mounted in bathroom ceilings and can be used to provide unlimited comfort zones - with the ability to turn off unused areas of the structure to save energy.

Installation

[edit]

In high-rise residential construction, typically each fan coil unit requires a rectangular through-penetration in the concrete slab on top of which it sits. Usually, there are either 2 or 4 pipes made of ABS, steel or copper that go through the floor. The pipes are usually insulated with refrigeration insulation, such as acrylonitrile butadiene/polyvinyl chloride (AB/PVC) flexible foam (Rubatex or Armaflex brands) on all pipes, or at least on the chilled water lines to prevent condensate from forming.

Unit ventilator

[edit]

A unit ventilator is a fan coil unit that is used mainly in classrooms, hotels, apartments and condominium applications. A unit ventilator can be a wall mounted or ceiling hung cabinet, and is designed to use a fan to blow outside air across a coil, thus conditioning and ventilating the space which it is serving.

European market

[edit]

The Fan Coil is composed of one quarter of 2-pipe-units and three quarters of 4-pipe-units, and the most sold products are "with casing" (35%), "without casing" (28%), "cassette" (18%) and "ducted" (16%).[2]

The market by region was split in 2010 as follows:

Region Sales Volume in units[2] Share
Benelux 33 725 2.6%
France 168 028 13.2%
Germany 63 256 5.0%
Greece 33 292 2.6%
Italy 409 830 32.1%
Poland 32 987 2.6%
Portugal 22 957 1.8%
Russia, Ukraine and CIS countries 87 054 6.8%
Scandinavia and Baltic countries 39 124 3.1%
Spain 91 575 7.2%
Turkey 70 682 5.5%
UK and Ireland 69 169 5.4%
Eastern Europe 153 847 12.1%

See also

[edit]
  • Thermal insulation
  • HVAC
  • Construction
  • Intumescent
  • Firestop

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Fan Coil Unit". Heinen & Hopman. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
  2. ^ a b "Home". Eurovent Market Intelligence.

 

Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Jefferson County


Driving Directions From Butler Supply to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Lowe's Home Improvement to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Fenton Sew and Vac to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Cliff Cave County Park to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Cole County Historical Museum to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Visit Jefferson County Tennessee to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Jefferson Barracks Park to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Cliff Cave County Park to Royal Supply Inc
Driving Directions From Gardens of Jefferson County to Royal Supply Inc

Reviews for Royal Supply Inc


Royal Supply Inc

Toney Dunaway

(5)

This is another amazing place where we will do much more business. They are not tyrannical about the totally useless face diapers, they have a great selection of stock, they have very knowledgeable staff, very friendly staff. We got the plumbing items we really needed and will be getting more plumbing items. They also have central units, thermostats, caulking, sealants, doors, seems everything you need for a mobile home. We've found a local treasure and will be bringing much more business. Their store is clean and tidy as well!

Royal Supply Inc

Terry Self

(1)

Horrible workmanship, horrible customer service, don't show up when they say they are. Ghosted. Was supposed to come back on Monday, no call no show. Called Tuesday and Wednesday, left messages both days. Nothing. Kinked my line, crooked to the pad and house, didn't put disconnect back on, left the trash.....

Royal Supply Inc

bill slayton

(1)

Went to get a deadbolt what they had was one I was told I'd have take it apart to lengthen and I said I wasn't buying something new and have to work on it. Thing of it is I didn't know if it was so that it could be lengthened said I didn't wanna buy something new I had to work on just to fit my door. He got all mad and slung the whole box with part across the room. A real business man. I guess the owner approves of his employees doing as such.

Royal Supply Inc

Ae Webb

(5)

Royal installed a new furnace and air conditioner just before we got our used mobile home. Recently, the furnace stopped lighting. Jared (sp?) made THREE trips to get it back to good. He was so gracious and kind. Fortunately for us it was still under warranty. BTW, those three trips were from Fenton, Missouri to Belleville, Illinois! Thanks again, Jared!

Royal Supply Inc

Gidget McCarthy

(5)

Very knowledgeable, friendly, helpful and don't make you feel like you're inconveniencing them. They seem willing to take all the time you need. As if you're the only thing they have to do that day. The store is clean, organized and not cluttered, symmetrical at that. Cuz I'm even and symmetricals biggest fan. It was a pleasure doing business with them and their prices are definitely reasonable. So, I'll be doing business with them in the future no doubt.

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

R410A offers improved energy efficiency, better heat transfer capabilities, and a lower environmental impact due to its non-ozone-depleting properties. It also operates at higher pressures, which can enhance overall system performance.
Retrofitting an existing HVAC system designed for older refrigerants like R22 to use R410A is generally not recommended. This is because R410A operates at higher pressures and requires different components and lubricants, making a complete system replacement or upgrade necessary.
When selecting an HVAC unit for a mobile home, consider factors such as the units size and capacity suited to the homes square footage, energy efficiency ratings like SEER (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio), compatibility with ductwork if applicable, and professional installation requirements.
Systems using R410A typically require regular inspections to ensure proper pressure levels due to its high-pressure operation. Additionally, routine maintenance checks on coils, filters, and other components are crucial for optimal performance and longevity.
While R410A does not deplete the ozone layer, it still has a global warming potential (GWP). Proper handling during installation and servicing is essential to minimize leaks. Future regulations may further restrict its use in favor of more environmentally friendly alternatives.